QUOTE(herbsinger42 @ Feb 20 2008, 06:50 PM)

I support soaps as a work study program for actors and writers...For anything else... seriously, how many ways can an actor say a given line, and still demonstrate some continuity??? The seventh time is not the charm. Now, watching your favorite hunk or hunkette for an hour... with or with out that troublesome clothing... I get that, too.But a great soap? They on occasion, produce a terrific story line... But they don't really follow a character arch... they follow ratings' archs... and are beholden to advertisers more than a creative format. Really good actors learn and go on... if they've been there the whole time... I'm thinkin, fear of flying.
I knew (when typing that) I was going to catch some guff for the "great soap opera" line ... but, really, GH - in its prime - WAS a great soap. It tackled an incredible organ donor s/l in the 80s and an HIV s/l in the early 90s. At that time (and for about five years after the HIV s/l), it was a socially aware soap that wasn't just hunky guys w/out shirts on and hottie chicks in tight, skimpy clothes - although there was that, too, and that didn't hurt, lol. The whole Luke and Laura s/l was revisited in the 90s as well regarding the way they originally got together - which was through rape. Their son - played by Jonathan Jackson - found out after his girlfriend was raped and that touched off another incredible s/l full of character development, social awareness - and strong, responsible writing. (And if I'm not badly mistaken, JJ won several daytime Emmys during that time.)
At that time, GH's head writers did, indeed follow character arcs (development & complexity), not just mindless plot points to move the story along. The show had teeth. Then we lost Gloria Monty. Then we lost Claire Labine. And now we have Bob Guza - who incorporates all of the bad things people think about soaps and so much more heinousness - and Jill Farren Phelps. I really have nothing good to say about either of those two b/c they have taken that show and reduced it to a misogynistic, violence glorifying, dumbed-down, moronic ratings grab (at best) which I can't stand to watch anymore regardless of the hotness of some of the guys. (I'm trying to restrain my rant about how truly truly truly bad they are.)
Anyway, my point in all of that was that Jonathan Jackson was one of those who learned and left (before GH turned into the mess it is now) and has done pretty well for himself, even if he hasn't made as big a splash as, say, Brad Pitt or Demi Moore. And, incidentally, Nathan Fillion (Malcolm Reynolds, Firefly) was on One Life to Live for several years before he, too, left.
QUOTE(herbsinger42 @ Feb 20 2008, 06:50 PM)

I am fully prepared to be roasted alive by you folk that love 'em. May I suggest a ginger sauce?
Ah, I prefer deep frying to a roast. But bring on the ginger sauce!